Tag Archives: DD4T

DD4T is a lightweight framework on top of the Tridion APIs, aimed at facilitating the development of dynamic web sites with Tridion.

Logging in DD4T

When you write a .NET web application based on DD4T, you will probably have some preferred way of logging. In most cases you would use one of the common logging frameworks, like Log4Net or MS EntLib. But how can you get DD4T itself to log?

DD4T does not confine you to one particular logging framework. Instead it has a wrapper architecture that makes it easy to support multiple types of logger. At the moment, MS EntLib and Log4Net are both supported. If you want to use a different logging framework you can easily write your own wrapper by copying one of the existing ones.

So how do you get logging to work?

  1. Add a reference to the logging framework of your choice (e.g. for MS EntLib that would be Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Logging.dll).
  2. Configure this logging framework in the normal way.
  3. Add a reference to the corresponding DD4T log wrapper (in this case DD4T.LogWrappers.Entlib.dll).
  4. Add a key to the appSettings section of your Web.config to tell DD4T which log wrapper it should use:

<add key=”DD4T.LoggerClass” value=”DD4T.LogWrappers.Entlib.EntLibLogger, DD4T.LogWrappers.Entlib” />

That’s it. Now DD4T will log depending on the configuration of your logging framework.


What is DD4T and why should I care?

Imagine this: you are an engineer or web developer, and the company you work for has just got itself a license for Tridion. So they send you off to get yourself trained. After a grueling week of getting to grips with Yet Another Complex Piece of Software, you feel that you at least understand the basics. You have created your first schema, written your first template, and you just can’t wait to build your first web site – until you run into some guy at the coffee machine, who asks you if you shouldn’t be using “DD4T”.

Sound familiar? Keep reading! In this post I will explain what DD4T is, and why it might or might not be useful for you.

DD4T is short for Dynamic Delivery for Tridion. It is a thin layer of functionality on top of the Tridion APIs that exposes the Tridion object model to dynamic web applications. The goal of DD4T is to allow you to develop a Tridion-based web application directly, without having to code templates.

Maybe a picture will make this clearer. The “classic” Tridion style of implementation (which is still used in 95% of the cases) looks like this:

blog - template development

The logic of your web site is built by a template developer. However, he or she does not develop this logic directly. They write templates which operate on the content management server. These templates generate server / client logic that runs on the web application server.

About two years ago, a group of seasoned Tridion geeks decided that this was no longer the way of the future. The templating approach – they felt – was prohibiting them from using their favourite web development tools optimally. The java-fans among them would really like to develop web apps with Spring MVC, using Eclipse as their IDE, and storing all the code in Git or SVN. The .NET-buffs were dying to write their sites in ASP.NET MVC, using Visual Studio and Team Foundation Server.

They decided there was another way. Before long, their initiative had a name – DD4T – and a home on the internet. The open source project was launched in September 2011.

Compared to a templating implementation, a DD4T implementation looks slightly but significantly different:

blog - dynamic development

Here, the template developer has been replaced by a web (application) developer, who writes his/her code directly in a web application environment.

Of course, that does not mean that the developer is working in the same environment as the people visiting your site. You would normally set up a development environment for this. Or better still: each developer can develop and run / debug the entire web application on his own work station. But logically, there is no difference between what the developer sees and what the visitors of your site see.

This paves the way for the total leverage of Visual Studio, or Eclipse, or whichever programming environment the developer happens to be a fan of.

The DD4T approach has many advantages, not only for developers, but also for their managers, as well as the content editors / marketers who actually use Tridion to manage their web sites. I’ll try to sum them up.

Advantages for developers

  • Developers have Intellisense for the code that really matters: the .NET / Java code that makes up the web site
  • They can use step-through debugging for the web application
  • They can use unit tests to check the consistency of the website after every change
  • They can store their code in a source code management system (like TFS, Git or SVN)
  • They can make local changes without interfering with the other developers on the team
  • And most importantly: they can take their skills in creating .NET / Java web applications and put them to use very easily, without having to deal with the complex and often confusing ‘detour’ of templating


Advantages for IT / project managers

  • Teams are much easier and cheaper to staff (there are many more .NET / Java developers than there are Tridion developers)
  • Even if your team is lacking the required .NET / Java skills, it is much easier to train them, with all the available resources on the net
  • Better leverage of investments in developer tooling (e.g. SCM, automated build systems, etc)
  • A new version of the entire site can be deployed at the click of a button (without lengthy republishing of entire site)
  • Very well suited for agile development processes
  • Releases can be managed better (they can be planned more easily, rolled back more easily, etc)


Advantages for editors

  • Publishing is much quicker (because the templates are very simple)
  • They don’t have to wait so long for  bugs to be fixed and enhancements to be made


Of course there are some disadvantages as well. When you decide to go with DD4T, you are not going to use Tridion as a web site development platform, but only as a content management platform. Hence, changes to your web site cannot (easily) be deployed by publishing from Tridion. Instead, you need a separate web development platform, for example Visual Studio + TFS (or Eclipse + Git/SVN if you’re building a java web site). If you do not already have such a development environment, you are incurring extra costs.

A second drawback is the fact that DD4T is not supported by SDL. That sounds more dramatic than it really is. Tridion only supports its own public APIs, not the code that customers write on top of it. In a ‘classic’ Tridion implementation, the template code is not covered by your support contract with SDL Tridion. However, the interaction of your templates with the Tridion API is completely supported.

Similarly, DD4T itself is not supported by Tridion, but the calls it makes to the Tridion API are. And since DD4T is open source, you have unrestricted access to the source code. On top of that, the framework is supported by an active community, consisting of long-time Tridion experts.


A lot has happened in the last year. Big companies have decided that the pros outweighed the cons, and have launched web sites based on this framework. Even more are busy migrating towards DD4T, or are staging proofs of concept. SDL itself has recently launched its new flagship web site, completely built on DD4T. It may still be a relatively new initiative, but that is apparently not stopping them from giving it a try!



DD4T is a very attractive alternative to templating as a way to build web sites out of Tridion. It makes the lives of your developers easier, resulting in a shorter time to market and a higher quality of work. Plus it makes it much easier to deploy changes. The main caveat is that the framework itself is not part of the Tridion product suite, and as such not formally supported.

The value of DD4T is demonstrated by the fact that many Tridion customers are either switching to it, or are seriously considering switching. If you own or support a Tridion-driven web site, you should at least give this some consideration.

Ready to try it out, or just interested in finding out more? Go to http://code.google.com/p/dynamic-delivery-4-tridion/.